Als ik hier kijk: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_sx110is%2Cpanasonic_dmctz5&show=all
Zou ik voor de canon gaan omdat die meer mogelijkheden heeft die mij aanspreken.
Lees ik de review van de panasonic dan zie ik
Unfortunately, as before, what's behind the lens does not entirely match the glass. Although image quality has again been slightly improved with the new model (noise reduction at higher ISOs is a lot less intrusive) all is still not rosy in Panasonic's garden. The tiny sensor means that noise and a general softness caused by noise reduction is visible in the TZ5's output even at base ISO. Of course things don't exactly get better at higher sensitivities and anything higher than ISO 400 should be avoided if you plan to print your images at a decent size or publish them online at a high resolution.
Daar word ik niet vrolijk van. Aan de andere kant, http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3726
Canon doet het niet veel beter. En zoals die redacteur het daar verwoord, het zijn andere camera's.
In truth, the SX110 targets a different user than the TZ5. There are manual controls here, for starters, and the simple but well-stocked menus and solid performance of the SX110 encourage you to get out and take some shots rather than get wrapped up in lots of novelty. The Canon doesn't hold your hand as much as some competitors, but it doesn't get in your way either. Hence, if you're serious about photographs, the SX110 has the tools to get the job done in an efficient, workmanlike manner that earns your respect for its capabilities the longer you spend with it.
Dat komt ook terug als je ze op features vergelijkt.